ADEPT | Gagauzia 2016 | Presidential 2016 | Elections 2015 | Bashkan 2015 | Gagauzia 2012 | Political Parties
|
|
e-journal #27 |
Another reason is that ruling party has eased the pressure wielded on opposition leaders. Moreover, during its March 25 session majority faction voted in favour of restoring Lidia Gutu as Head of Social Protection Commission, formerly designated to the position by “Braghis Alliance”. The move was explained by the “need to promote women in politics and to key positions”, as well as “to show that relations between majority faction and opposition are constructive”.
On the other hand, those relationships are still tensed. And this despite the fact that Ministry of Interior did answer to questions Christian-Democrats long insisted on.
On March 25 deputies examined a number of legal acts, which we would consider in greater detail below:
Modifications to the law are:
Currently the amount is 2,000 Euro, which is viewed as being too low, whereas the interdiction as being too restrictive for the market economy and promotion of economic ties on the international scale.
Noteworthy, the move was severely criticised both by opposition and ruling party that argued the law facilitated capital exodus from the country. In response lawmakers pointed that once goods were taken out of the country, the money they were bought on, stayed in the country.
The law completes the Code on Administrative Offence with a new article 17423 “Breaching the law on state representation in economic societies”.
This article provides sanctions ranging 3,600 and 54,000 Lei for: violation of rights and legal interests of the state during the establishment, operation, reorganisation and liquidation of societies, thereby the state shall be ascribed the role of participant having unlimited rights or its participation quota in registered capital shall be decreased, in cases prohibited by law; concealing the conditions in which a state representative holds or has got a patrimonial interest in the economic enterprise and failed to notify authorised bodies; concealing data on economic or financial activity or any other information that state authorities is entitled to request, etc.
The law brings a number of legal acts in accordance with the provisions of the new Code on Penal Procedures and Law on Private Detectives and Security. Noteworthy, the draft raised a rich harvest of criticism. In the eyes of many it is too restrictive and grants a too broad mandate to Ministry of Internal Affairs and other state structures on the expense of similar private structures.
The draft passed in the first reading envisages freezing for a two year period the debts to the state social security fund incurred by medical institutions, as well as restructuring for another five years the aforesaid debt once the freezing period expires. The cost of the move is estimated at 36 million Lei. Government claims that the current state of affairs thwarts any attempt to enforce obligatory medical insurance.
The draft passed in the first reading entitles State Treasury units to execute the writ of execution and court ruling related to extracting funds from state budget or funds of state-funded institution, in case the latter failed to present in due time payment documents.
Under current law, budget executor (i.e. heads of public institutions) should transmit writs to executors of the treasury, however they never do, thereby postponing the execution, which in turn was subject to sanctions and fines. However, those amendments would allow avoiding such cases. It also might deprive local public administration of the funds needed for activities, in cases when there are writs of execution for huge amounts. One of the recurring issues during the discussions was responsibility of Ministries and decision-makers who due to their lack of competence or abuses prejudice against law subjects, who later regain their rights in court, thus incurring additional costs to the state.
The law passed in the first reading entrusts rayon public administration to sell plots surrounding enterprises, housing and real estate and agricultural societies. The need to pass the law stems from the fact that local agencies of the Privatisation Department were shut down, whereas their functions are now to be taken over by local authorities in line with the decentralisation and local autonomy principles.
2011 2010 2009 2008 2007 2006 2005 2004 2003 2002 2001 |