Alegerile parlamentare din 2021 în Republica Moldova - alegeri.md
 Monitoring→Public Institutions→Parliament

Activity of the Parliament on February 15–28, 2006

|print version|mail| e-journal #68 |

Reshuffles

Legislative documents

Law for the modification and completion of the law on Government. The law stipulates the creation of the Ministry of Local Public Administration and excludes the National Bureau for Migration and Agency for Regional Development from the list of specialised central bodies of public administration. The initiative on creation of this ministry, in the formula proposed by executive, has raised controversial talks and criticism of the parliamentary opposition. The parliamentary majority supported the creation of this ministry, but accepted that its functions and competences be discussed further with the “involvement” of all those interested.

Law for the modification of the Code of Penal Procedure. The amendments to Articles 429 and 455 of the Code of Penal Procedure annul the obligation to declare the appeal and annulling appeal “in typed form.” This solution was adopted to ensure the access of inmates or persons who are incapable to fill up contestations against judgments to justice.

Law on cereals and deposit certificates for cereals. The adopted document establishes new regulations on activities of maintenance of cereals, setting up a special register of all enterprises working in the area.

Draft law for the modification of the Law on Governmental Agent. The draft adopted in the first reading proposes the introduction of new orders on repayment of compensations established by the European Court of Human Rights (ECHR), as well as on execution of the right to regress against persons who are to blame for sums that Moldova is obliged to pay through ECHR judgments or agreement on amicable settlement of a cause. The Prosecutor-General will file the regress after the Governmental Agent presents information about the case concerned. Parliamentary political forces and representatives of legal community have univocally appreciated the draft, with the persecution of some judges who have obeyed to political-administrative pressures and passed unfair judgments, which were contested in the ECHR later, being the main danger.

Draft law for the completion of the law on publishing and enforcement of official acts. The document voted in the first reading introduces the obligation to provide free access to official acts that represent the legislative fund of the Republic of Moldova. The Government regards this amendment as inopportune, as the access to the legislative-normative base is ensured via the recently launched website of the Justice Ministry.

Parliamentary control

Hearings

Lawmakers heard information about control on execution of the June 30, 2000 law # 1100 on making and circulation of ethyl alcohol and alcohol production. According to a report by the parliamentary commission for agriculture and processing industry, the lack of a strict record of making and circulation of ethyl alcohol and alcohol products generates big losses to the state budget. Estimates show that about 200 million lei (15.5 million dollars) could be raised to the budget. The lack of an electronic record register of all businesses working in the area is the main cause of shortcomings, which would contain updated data on production they make or/and sell. Lawmakers proposed harsher sanctions for violation of legislation on this sector and indicated the need to ensure a strict control on use of sugar in wine industry, combat of counterfeiting of alcohol production.

Questions and interpellations

Lawmakers have heard several answers to questions that the Ministry of Economy and Trade has earlier received regarding:

The lawmaker representing the AMN faction, Anatol Onceanu, submitted several interpellations to the Moldovan president on February 17, 2006, asking him to speak out publicly about the “legal coverage of the direct involvement in direction of legislative, executive and juridical powers” and statements of Romanian President Traian Basescu regarding “the request for a route paper of the E.U. for the Republic of Moldova,” “boost of the Romania-Moldova bilateral relations, starting from the principle «two states — one nation» which will meet again in the E.U.,” “translation of the entire Romanian nation inside of the E.U.”

Opposition representatives accused on February 23 and 24 the parliamentary opposition and some of its representatives of abuses and usurpation of some functions improper to a state with a democratic parliamentary regime. The closing of a plenary sitting of the Parliament after an hour of questions and interpellations was the cause of these accusations. The need to modify the Parliament’s Regulation was taken back to the foreground on this occasion, with the opposition and parliamentary majority insisting on introduction of some amendments to establish the procedures of parliamentary control clearly.

The most unexpected statement was delivered by the chairman of the parliamentary commission for culture, science, education, youth, sport and mass media, Victor Stepaniuc, former chairman of the PCRM faction. Stepaniuc said that the legislation stipulates the right of lawmakers to questions and interpellations and “it does not exist in Constitution,”[1] while the way this right is used at plenary sittings “is inefficient,” a situation requiring the revision of legislation and practices in the area.

  1. ↑ Article 105 from the Constitution (Questions and Interpellations) establishes that “the Government and each of its members must answer questions or interpellations of lawmakers” and the “Parliament can adopt a motion to express its stance on object of interpellation.”