ADEPT | Gagauzia 2016 | Presidential 2016 | Elections 2015 | Bashkan 2015 | Gagauzia 2012 | Political Parties
|
|
e-journal #55 |
One plenary sitting of the Parliament took place in the period concerned but it had a record duration — more than five hours. The sitting heard a report of the Finance Ministry regarding the execution of the state budget for 2004, with lawmakers raising questions and objections regarding execution of the budget. Also, the same sitting adopted in the first lecture a draft law on bases of the budgetary-fiscal policy for next year. Taking into account the importance of this document, as well as the fact that it will serve as ground for state budget incomes in 2006, both the opposition, and the parliamentary majority demonstrated a great interest for this draft through criticism and proposals, which will be taken into consideration when the draft will be adopted in the final lecture.
The draft law adopted in the first lecture will establish general principles and norms for implementation of some provisions of the fiscal legislation next year and will create the base of state budget incomes for 2006.
Most and basic amendments envisage the Fiscal Code and namely several key chapters:
Estimates of the Finance Ministry show that collections from income taxes will increase by about 200 million lei (by 100 million lei from individuals and businesses) after reduction of the fiscal burden.
According to estimates, these amendments will increase the budget revenues on account of VAT by over 150 million lei. On the other hand, annulment of facilities could provoke higher prices for these goods, and therefore many lawmakers expressed dissatisfaction and criticized these amendments, fearing that they will hit the socially vulnerable categories and agricultural producers.
A series of modifications in the list of goods for excises, as well as of excises for certain goods are proposed, shortening at the same time the procedure for their fiscal management. About 140 million lei is expected to be additionally collected after introduction of these modifications.
A separate amendment calls for exemption from state tax of public authorities financed from state budget and local public administration authorities, for actions and contesting of court rulings, if these authorities are defendants.
This amendment had earlier provoked a series of objections, including from private sector representatives, who feared that they face an unfair treatment and the state avoids through this mechanism to apply punishment, including financial responsibility, on public functionaries who are to blame for misuse of authority in relations with nongovernmental sector.
The draft law adopted in the first lecture introduces new norms in the Customs Code that prohibit the introduction and placement of motor transports, engines and car bodies older than 10 years under importation customs regimes, customs storehouse, under free zone customs destination.
Also, the draft says that motor transports which cannot be placed under any customs regime or customs destination, as well as those prohibited for introduction in country cannot be registered. The state registration will be based on customs documents which confirm the placement of transport under free circuit in Moldova’s territory.
This norm is a response to lots of doubtful cases of registration of transports with violation of customs legislation, as well as of transports prohibited for introduction in Moldova. Several penal cases have been filed in this regard, including against judges who issued decisions on mandatory registration of motor transports by the Information Technologies Department, in spite of absence of necessary customs documents.
The Parliament passed a decision and approved the execution of the 2004 state budget with incomes in the amount of 5,533,900,000 lei and spending in the amount of 5,411,900,000 lei, with a surplus of 122 million lei. The executive has already directed this surplus of budgetary sources to foreign debts.
According to a report unveiled by the Finance Ministry, many data on execution chapters were indicated.
The consumer price index grew by 12 percent in the same period, while the monthly inflation was one percent (compared with 1.2 percent in 2003).
The average monthly salary on national economy accounted for 1,104 lei, and rose by about 10 percent.
Exports increased by about 25 percent (by some 196 million dollars) compared with 2003.
Imports rose by 26.5 percent (about 371 million dollars).
The trade balance in 2004 registered a deficit of almost 780 million dollars, by over 175 million dollars more than in 2003.
million lei more than planned. Also, the budgetary incomes in GDP were on the decline.
More than 91 percent of taxes were collected, by about six percentage points more than in 2003. Collections of revenues from all types of taxes were on the rise: income tax, land tax, real estate tax, indirect taxes, excises, VAT, etc.
Over 643 million lei was transferred from the state budget to the fund for assistance of territories in 2004, and about 220 million lei was transferred from budget for special destination (capital investments, state programmes, etc.).
Examining these results, opposition lawmakers highlighted the lack of a well-considered policy on investment of public money in long-term development projects. The budget was appreciated as of consumption, not of perspective, with clear priorities on investment sector and economy development.
Also, lawmakers indicated the need to attract inflows of foreign capital, including of remittances from abroad, in investment sector. They outlined the need to stir up the collection of taxes, to enhance the responsibility of public authorities for allocation and efficient management of public resources, general improvement of business climate.
The executive will fulfil these tasks for execution of the 2005 state budget and for a continued improvement of legislation on this sector.
Nor the 2005 summer session was an exception, since last sitting had a record duration of 4–5 hours. To mention that the Parliament adopted some very important drafts in the period concerned, both from point of view of their norms, and of major political and social impact. Firstly, we envisage the law on basic provisions of the special juridical statute of settlements on the left bank of the Dniester river (Transnistria), a draft proposed by the chief of state after consultations of principles with all parliamentary factions. Representatives of civil society, public associations in Moldova, including ADEPT, had a limited possibility to comment on this draft.
The importance of this document requires a distinct study on its text, and we will unveil this study after enactment of the law.
Parliamentarians also debated on several drafts on rectification of the state budget and state social insurance budget for 2005, with certain representatives of the parliamentary opposition raising objections and criticizing the executive and governing in general.
This decision indicates the following strategic directions of scientific activity:
This decision would not present a major interest, if it did not abrogate another two decisions of the legislature on this issue:
The October 24, 2002 decision # 1401-XV on approval of the list of key research-development directions for 2003–2010, financed from the state budget, and the December 25, 2003 decision #566-XV on approval of strategic research-development priorities for 2004–2010.
The list approved through these decisions comprised the following priorities:
Thus, we can say that the Government changes its priorities of scientific activity and development with less than two years after approval, excluding or cardinally suppressing fields such as:
The decision adopted at the initiative of the Academy of Sciences does not say what will happen with the ongoing programmes and projects implemented under auspices of abrogated decisions, nor it motivates the need to modify these directions, which had earlier been described as strategic and basic.
It is hard to appreciate the new priorities of this sector, as well as the term when the scientific community will be convinced why these are the key directions, since the previous ones are modified in less than two years after adoption.
The draft adopted in the first lecture proposes the redistribution of state-administrated land fields and granting of about 15 hectares of land to the state-owned enterprise Orasul Vinului, created to implement a commercial investment project, aimed to promote the domestic vine growing and wine making sector.
Thus, these fields will be excluded from public sector and included in private sector of the state, in order to get the possibility to sell them, while the enterprise will be able to use the raised resources for investment purposes. This initiative provoked objections from many lawmakers, who described the creation of this commercial complex as inopportune, saying that there are lots of investment possibilities in the Chisinau municipality and other available territories in Moldova.
Also, they feared that these fields could be abusively used, so that the state be harmed in a double measure:
The draft adopted in the first lecture proposes that the patrimony of the wine plant Milestii Mici be declared as object of the national cultural heritage of Moldova, in a move to ensure the maintenance of this business as an exclusive state-owned estate and to ban the privatisation or sale of the complex to its components.
The draft proposes to award this status to:
Protection of this patrimony will be based on a special activity regime, including a series of principles in this area: priority of activities which exclude deteriorations and destructions; limitation of impact of anthropogenic activity; prevention of influence of harmful factors, etc.
The draft also proposes that the winery Milestii Mici hold the preferential right to use the geographic indication “Milestii Mici” in name of company, trademarks, and other industrial property objects. Thus, the draft prohibits the use of identical and similar names which contain this geographic indication for commercial purposes, if this use would produce confusions or indicate a connection with the winery Milestii Mici. The same norms obliges the holders of trademarks or names of firm containing the geographic indication “Milestii Mici” to exclude it within five years after enactment of this law.
This winery was created in 1969, being specialised in production, storage and sale of wines. It covers about 50 kilometers of galleries, located at depths of 30–80 metres, while technological tanks have a capacity of 60 million liters of wine. Also, it owns a collection of 1.5 million bottles of wine, made from 1973 to 2004.
It exports more than 90 percent of its production.
To mention that the Parliament had earlier awarded a similar status of national cultural heritage to the wine enterprise Cricova (see the July 18, 2003 law # 322-XV).
This draft proposes the distribution of more than 600 million lei which was additionally raised to the budget in the first half of this year. This amount will be mainly used for the following purposes:
To mention that many opposition lawmakers bitterly criticized the activity and actions of the Government in this sector, with most of them describing previous decisions of the executive, which have no legal financial coverage and without approval of the Parliament, as illegal. They indicated in this regard the decisions on salary rise, use of means from the social fund to pay indemnities for veterans, and others.
This draft calls for rise of spending from the state social insurance budget by over 24 million lei, of which over 23 million lei will go to cover rises and indexation of pensions. About 300,000 lei will be used for distribution and bank service of these amounts, while more than 650,000 lei will be allocated to cover the spending for fiscal tax collectors.
A large amount will be used for recalculation of pensions of executive members, which will account for about 1,700 lei on average, and this is a two-fold rise compared with the precedent period. Also, the medium pension for public functionaries rose by about 100 lei, up to almost 400 lei. The draft says nothing about why the spending for fiscal tax collectors rose since their salaries were not increased, nor the need to use large sources for services of commercial banks which distribute money for social insurance is argued.
2011 2010 2009 2008 2007 2006 2005 2004 2003 2002 2001 |