Alegerile parlamentare din 2021 în Republica Moldova - alegeri.md
 Monitoring→Politics→Transnistrian Conflict

Transnistrian Conflict on September 16–30, 2008

Voronin-Smirnov meeting not taking place

The meeting between President Vladimir Voronin and Transnistrian leader Igor Smirnov set for the third decade of September 2008 did not take place. The intrigue of the meeting concerned consisted in preparing the ground for an eventual trilateral meeting in November 2008, with the participation of Russian President Dmitri Medvedev. According to the Moscow-based newspaper Kommersant, the November-scheduled meeting should crown Russia’s efforts to prove before the summit of NATO foreign ministers that Russia is capable to settle frozen conflict on a peaceful way as well.

The Voronin-Smirnov meeting was allegedly cancelled for very curious reasons: in particular, the parties failed to agree on the time and place for meeting; there were no security guarantees for the Transnistrian leader, etc. But the most plausible argument was that parties did not want to give up previous approaches relating to principles of conflict settlement. Moldovan authorities insisted on the documents they have worked out in the last two years and on the “5+2” negotiation process. In their turn, Transnistrian authorities insisted on the recognition of Transnistria and signing of a cooperation agreement with the Republic of Moldova.

Moldova’s position on Transnistria settlement exposed on U.N. platform

While addressing the 63rd session of the United Nations General Assembly on September 29, 2008, Minister of Foreign Affairs and European Integration Andrei Stratan told the viewpoint of Moldovan authorities regarding the reform of the Security Council, which should encourage and optimise “U.N. actions in the area of international peacekeeping and security, development of cooperation with regional organisations and member states, including with the view to settle conflicts in various regions of the world.”

According to Andrei Stratan, “developments in South Ossetia (Georgia) have proved one more time that frozen conflicts are instability hotbeds and threat the regional and international security. Intensifying international cooperation to settle conflicts and prevent in future such situations of crisis which endanger the sovereignty and territorial integrity of states has a major importance for the Republic of Moldova as well, as it faces a frozen conflict in eastern districts of the country.”

In this context, Mr. Stratan reconfirmed Moldova’s position regarding some aspects of the Russian-Georgian conflict and vision on principles to settle the Transnistrian conflict. He assured that the Republic of Moldova: