Alegerile parlamentare din 2021 în Republica Moldova - alegeri.md
 Monitoring→Economy→The Socioeconomic Environment

Economic Policies on May 23 – June 5, 2005

|print version|mail| e-journal #52 |

Banks and insurance

The governor of the National Bank of Moldova (BNM), Leonid Talmaci, has reported on activity of BNM in 2004 to the parliament at a recent sitting. Although the bank sector did not post a wonderful evolution, the financial stability was one of its successes in 2004.

The evolutions on the currency market and dynamic of inflation in 2004 threw doubts on the BNM’s efforts to respect the monetary targets from the Monetary-Currency Policy for 2004. The supply of currency on domestic market rose under the influence of remittances from abroad (a 70-percent estimated growth) and collections from exports (25 percent). To oppose the excessive appreciation of the Leu, the BNM intensively purchased currency in the second quarter, so that its reserves rose by 55 percent in December up to over 470 million dollars. The annual inflation rate in December 2004 was 12.5 percent, compared with the 8–10 percent inflation forecasted by BNM.

Under such a situation, the BNM had to introduce important changes of key monetary policy tools, and namely it increased the targets for monetary base and unit M2. Raising currency reserves through acquisition of currency from banks was the main monetary growth channel in 2004. However, this tendency seems to be dangerous since it generates new inflationary spirals. The sterilization operations undertaken by BNM were inefficient, while the used tools had low financial maturity terms.

BNM officials have recently said that the National Bank of Moldova could raise this year 600 million dollars in international reserves, though they remained almost unchanged in the first four months of 2005.

BNM purchased 277.1 million dollars on the domestic market in 2004, as a significant supply of currency was available on currency market, particularly generated by remittances of Moldovan nationals who work abroad, while the international reserves rose by 55 percent.

The remittances are on a significant rise this year as well. According to BNM, Moldovans transferred 153 million dollars in the first quarter via bank channels alone, by 53 percent more than in the similar period of 2004.

On the other hand, the remittances in currency represent a massive pressure on the domestic currency market since only ten percent of the money earned abroad represents direct investments, another 60–80 million dollars of annual remittances is deposited in banks, while the rest goes to consumption.

If the remittances grow in continuation the same way, they could amount to more than 600 million dollars this year, and for over one billion dollars, if taking into account the extra-bank inflows, too. We think that the BNM is trying to rebuild a normal stock of currency reserves, so that to enhance Moldova’s credibility (and to recover its image) on international capital markets and in front of foreign financiers.

Labor market

Foreign trade

Moldova and the world

The European Bank for Reconstruction and Development (EBRD) forecasts a 5.5-percent economic growth for Moldova in 2005

EBRD experts estimated that Moldova will register a 5.5-percent economic growth in 2005, compared with 7 percent in 2004.

The world economy will provide a less favorable environment for the transition economies in 2005, compared with 2004. The performances of the U.S. economy in 2004, as well as the positive estimates for 2005, suggest that the better results of the developed countries will reduce the capital inflows in the transition regions.

According to EBRD analysts, the economies in East Europe and former Soviet states will post a 5.2-percent average development pace in 2005, compared with 6.5 percent in 2004. The slower growth pace is particularly due to the worsening of economic climate at the world level; the high interest rates in the United States; possible declines of the capital inflows in this region.

The EBRD forecasts slower growth rates in all the CIS members, except for Azerbaijan. Thus, Russia’s economy will grow by 5.2 percent in 2005, compared with 7.1 percent in 2004; Ukraine 6.5 percent, compared with 12.1 percent in 2004; Armenia 8 percent, compared with 10.1 percent in 2004; Georgia and Belarus 6 percent, compared with 8.4 percent and, respectively, 11 percent in 2004; Kazakhstan 8.5 percent (9.4 percent in 2004); Tajikistan 8 percent (10.6 percent); Turkmenistan 7 percent (7.2 percent); Kyrgyzstan 4.5 percent (7.1 percent); Uzbekistan 4 percent (6 percent); and Azerbaijan 21 percent, compared with 10 percent in 2004.

In turn, the International Monetary Fund (IMF) indicates a slower economic growth in the CIS in its latest global economy development report. According to the IMF estimates, Moldova will register a 5-percent economic growth in 2005. The Economist Intelligence Unit launched a similar forecast. On the other hand, the Moldovan government expects a six-percent economic growth in 2005.

Economic growth in the CIS area. Forecasts of the EBRD for 2005 (%)
Source: BNS

Elsewhere, Kurt Geiger, director of the Business Group, the department for financial institutions of the EBRD, told Moldovan President Vladimir Voronin last week that the EBRD will continue to assist Moldova to strengthen and develop the progressive bank sector. EBRD experts appreciate the situation of Moldova’s bank sector as positive and stable.

Earlier, the EBRD had expressed readiness to start 10 new projects valued at 21 million euros in Moldova this year, including three worth about 10 million euros in the bank sector.

Under the EBRD Strategy for Moldova approved in July 2003, the Bank will assist the “development of the private bank sector and will provide efficient and adequate financing for private enterprises through local banks, especially for small- and medium-sized businesses and micro-enterprises.”

Although the EBRD has opened cheap enough special credit lines in several local commercial banks, such as Victoriabank, Moldindconbank and Mobiasbanca, they increase the interest rate 2–3-fold and make inaccessible the long-term credits, which are absolutely necessary to finance the investment and production spending. Problems such as increased unemployment rate, vulnerability of national producers to foreign stocks, low quality of investment environment, and inefficient promotion of exports are directly connected to accessibility of these credits.